Supreme Court of India
UNION OF INDIA VS. F. ROY CHOUDHARY on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.12 SECTION III-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10577/2020
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-09-2019
in SCA No. 3099/2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad]
UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
F. ROY CHOUDHARY & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 54721/2020 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES
IA No. 54719/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
For Petitioner(s): Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv.
Mr. Anukalp Jain, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv.
Ms. Chitrangda Rashtravara, Adv.
Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv.
Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv.
Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv.
Ms. Shivika Mehera, Adv.
Ms. Hemadri Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Kumar Parimal, Adv.
Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR
Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka- 2765, AOR
Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. R.S.M. Kalky, Adv.
Mr. S.P. Singh, Adv.
Ms. Deeksha Singh, Adv.
Mr. Lakshya Anant, Adv.
Digitally signed by
ABHINAV KUMAR
Date: 2026.10.27
17:17:04 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Addl. Solicitor General for the appellant; and Dr. K.S. Chauhan, learned Senior counsel and Mr. Kumar Parimal, learned counsel for the respondent(s).
3. Arguments concluded.
4. Judgment is reserved. (ABHINAV KUMAR) (CHETNA BALOONI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)