Supreme Court of India
RAJEEV RAKSHIT VS. CHANDNA SINGH RAKSHIT on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.5 SECTION II-D
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.20386/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-09-2026
in CRLMA No. 30547/2026 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]
RAJEEV RAKSHIT Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CHANDNA SINGH RAKSHIT Respondent(s)
IA No. 325741/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 326190/2026 - PASSING APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DECREE
UNDER ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Aparna Bhatt, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Karan Nagrath, Adv.
Ms. Nupur Kumar- 3078, AOR
Mr. Yash S Vijay, Adv.
Mr. Ambuj Tiwari, Adv.
Ms. Muskan Surana, Adv.
Mr. Aryan Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Joshua Tom Thomas, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Ms. Harshita Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Choraria- 4250, AOR
Ms. Kirti Pamar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) and having gone through the materials on record, we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
2. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (CHANDRESH) (POOJA SHARMA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) Digitally signed by CHANDRESH Date: 2026.10.27 16:40:14 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified