Supreme Court of India
ASHOK KUMAR VS. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33588/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-02-2024
in CRPPD No. 830/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]
ASHOK KUMAR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ANR. Respondent(s)
IA No. 252795/2026 - APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT
IA No. 252788/2026 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION
IA No. 252778/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 252785/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE
DEFECTS
IA No. 252784/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 252789/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)
IA No. 252793/2026 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, AOR
Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv.
Mr. Varun Ranjan, Adv.
Mr. Anubhav Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Kumar Verma, Adv.
Ms. Kalpana, Adv.
Mr. Devendra Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. B. Karunakaran- 3845, AOR
Mr. Arun, Adv.
Dr. P. V. Saravanaraja- 2064, AOR
Mr. K.chinraj, Adv.
Mrs. Chaitali Bhattacharya, Adv.
Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Adv.
Mrs. Priya Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. P.veerappan, Adv.
Mrs. Asoka Devi, Adv.
Digitally signed by
VISHAL ANAND
Date: 2026.10.27
16:49:38 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Nitin Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Amar Kumar Raizada, Adv.
Mr. Virender Maurya, Adv.
Ms. Sunita Majumdar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking one week’s adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the counsel, the matter is adjourned for one week. (VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)