Supreme Court of India
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH@ SANTOSH SINGH VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.5 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.13696/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-02-2024
in CRADB No. 1051/2016 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi]
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH@ SANTOSH SINGH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondent(s)
(IA
No.67566/2026
-
APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS,
IA
No.130135/2026 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS & IA
No. 214478/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 776/2025 (II-A)
(IA No. 122874/2025 - EX-PARTE BAIL, IA No. 2190/2025 - EXEMPTION
FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 2188/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No. 2189/2025 - SUSPENSION OF
SENTENCE AND IA No. 126442/2025 - SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE)
Date : 27-10-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, AOR
Mr. Shubham Dubey, Adv.
Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Adv.
Ms. Kaveri Rawal, Adv.
Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava- 2447, AOR
Mr. Shekhar Prasad Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Mahesh Srivastava, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR
Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Anushaka Ragunatha, Adv.
Mr. Sujeet Kumar Chaubey, Adv.
Ms. Anushka Raghunath, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND
Date: 2026.10.27
16:49:37 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned Orders passed by the High Court.
2. The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Pending applications shall also stand disposed of. (VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)