Supreme Court of India
V. GOPI VS. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5949/2026
V. GOPI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 27-10-2026 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) :
Ms. Anupradha Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ashish Yadav- 3501, AOR
Mr. Anuj Yadav, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. B. Karunakaran- 3845, AOR
Mr. Kamesh Guad, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal- 909, AOR
Mr. Rajeeva Kumar Ranjan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Mr. B. Karunakaran, learned Advocate-on-Record has filed only Memo of appearance in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 6. Vakalatnama is required to be filed as per rules. Respondent no. 5 has e-filed counter affidavit after the opportunity has already been declined on 21.09.2026. Apprise the fact to the Hon'ble Court as and when the matter is listed. Service is complete on respondent nos. 7 and 9 but none has entered appearance. Digitally signed by DIVYANSHI MISHRA Date: 2026.10.27 15:33:04 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Service report in respect of respondent nos. 8 and 10 to 12 is still awaited from the concerned jurisdictional Police Station. List the matter again on 01.12.2026. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar AR