Supreme Court of India
RAM KUMAR SINGH VS. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS UNION on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30213/2025
RAM KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS UNION & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
Diary No(s). 65879/2025 (IX-A)
Date : 27-10-2026 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Manik Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Puja Sharma- 1559, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Shukla- 3928 , AOR
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Rana Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Swetank Shantanu- 2244, AOR
Mr. Ajit Pudussery- 65, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Bamezai, Adv.
Mr. Naresh Kumar- 1271, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Shukla- 3928 , AOR
Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha- 2304, AOR
Mr. Pratham S Lal, Adv.
Mr. Piyush Sharma- 1701, AOR
Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 30213/2025 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 3 to 5, 12, 17 and 22 has already been filed. Digitally signed by DIVYANSHI MISHRA Date: 2026.10.27 15:33:06 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Service is complete on respondent nos. 2, 6, 9, 14, 15, 19, 20 and 23 but none has entered appearance. Deceased respondent nos. 8, 10, 13, 16 and 18 have been deleted vide the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated 27.07.2026. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 21, if any, be filed by 25.11.2026. Notice on I.A. No. 118759/2026 which is an impleadment application be given to the learned counsel for respondent no. 21. As per Office report, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 11 stating that the notice is served but proof of service has not been filed. However, today Mr. Manik Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that an affidavit along with three annexures ie., Annexure A1, A2 and A3 have been filed, which are proof of service on respondent nos. 7 and 11. Registry to verify and make necessary updation in the records. If the proof of service is found to have been filed as submitted, the same be taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file fresh particulars of respondent nos. 11, 14 and 19 and Mr. Piyush Sharma, learned Advocate-on-Record is directed to file spare copies of the impleadment application by 03.11.2026, as last opportunity. If above steps are taken, issue notice on impleadment application to respondent nos. 11, 14 and 19 and list the matter again on 01.12.2026. If not, list the matter before the Hon’ble Judge-in-Chambers for directions.
SLP(C) DNO. 65879/2025 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 4 and 5 has already been filed. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 11, 15 and 19 to 22 but none has entered appearance. Respondent nos. 8 to 10, 12 to 14, 16, 18 and 23 have been served in terms of the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated 27.07.2026 but none has entered appearance. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file fresh particulars alongwith spare copy in respect of respondent no. 17 by 03.11.2026 for re-issuance of notice. List the matter again on 01.12.2026. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar AR