Supreme Court of India
KEVAL SINGH RATHIYA @ KEVAL RATHIYA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG
Criminal Appeal No(s). 2861/2026
KEVAL SINGH RATHIYA @ KEVAL RATHIYA & ANR. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)
FOR PRE-FINAL HEARING
Date : 27-10-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jitendra Kumar- 3764, AOR
For Respondent(s) :
Ms. Ankita Sharma- 3833, AOR
Mr. Arjun D Singh, Adv.
Ms. Akanksha Kumari, Adv.
Ms. Gargi Vishwakarma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
As per Office report, Ms. Ankita Sharma, learned Advocate-on- Record has filed only memo of appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of the sole respondent. Vakalatnama is required to be filed as per rules. Scanned copies of the High Court and the Trial Court records have been received and duly been provided to the learned counsels for both the parties. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar AR Digitally signed by DIVYANSHI MISHRA Date: 2026.10.27 15:33:06 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified