Supreme Court of India
LATA BAI NISHAD VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG
Criminal Appeal No(s). 2243/2026
LATA BAI NISHAD Appellant(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)
Date : 27-10-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s) :
Mr. Devvrat, AOR
Ms. Irul Srivastava, Adv.
Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv.
Ms. Tamanna Khan, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Apoorv Shukla- 2830, AOR
Ms. Prabhleen A. Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Ilashri Gaur, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Mr. Apoorv Shukla, learned Advocate-on-Record has filed only Memo of appearance on behalf of the sole respondent. Vakalatnama is required to be filed as per rules and counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime. Scanned copies of the High Court and the Trial Court records have been received and duly been provided to the learned counsels for both the parties. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar AR Digitally signed by DIVYANSHI MISHRA Date: 2026.10.27 15:33:05 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified