Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
INDUSIND BANK LIMITED vs INDU SHARMA on 16 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER-SHEET** Page No. ....
**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN**
**Chamber Appeal No. 02 of 2026**
**Indusind Bank Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Indu Sharma & Anr.**
**Date: 16.10.2026**
Item No.19
Present: Sh. Vijay Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank Called out, Ld. Counsel for the Applicants present.
This Chamber Appeal has been filed by the Applicant bank on 20.08.2026 against the order of Ld. Registrar dated 18.08.2026 passed in Original application diary no.1071 of 2025 whereby Ld. Registrar declined to register the Original application on the grounds that the affidavits regarding capitalization of penal interest and address are not filed, the original application is not filed with bank official designation stamp, welfare stamp not affix on vakalatnama and 3<sup>rd</sup> part of OA filed without index outstanding amount calculation sheet not filed.
It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for Applicant Bank that the original application was duly refiled online on 31.01.2026 in e-DRT portal the e-DRT portal through which OA was filed itself reflects that the defects stood duly addressed. The Counsel for applicant dispatched the physical copy of the calculation sheet to the registry. Ld. Counsel for Applicants subsequently became aware that the document never reached the registry and was marked undelivered. As the counsel for the applicant never received back the said return it was bona fide assumed that the document duly served.
So, there was no deliberate omission or lapse on the part of the Ld. Counsel for Applicants. It is further submitted that declining registration of the OA would cause grave and irreparable injustice to the applicant bank and there was no deliberate delay in curing defect.
Heard Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank and perused the original application. The prayer of the Applicant Bank is allowable. Hence, allowed.
The Applicant Bank is directed cure all the defects within a period of 20 days, if any. If the Applicant Bank shall not cure the **ORDER-SHEET** Page No. ....
**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN**
**Chamber Appeal No. 02 of 2026**
**Indusind Bank Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Indu Sharma & Anr.**
defect within the time prescribed, it shall be presumed that the Applicant Bank is not interested to pursue the matter and this order shall have no effect after that period.
Chamber Appeal No. 02 of 2026 is disposed of accordingly.
Let the original application be restored to its original number after curing the defects.
Put up before Ld. Registrar on **30.11.2026**
(Umesh Kumar Sharma) Presiding Officer DRT, Dehradun