Central Administrative Tribunal
Anshul Badholiya vs WESTERN RAILWAY on 8 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD Order Sheet Item no.: 23 O.A./486/2026 (AHMEDABAD) [ RELIEVING ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 08/10/2026 ANSHUL BADHOLIYA Vs WESTERN RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : S S CHATURVEDI
For Respondent(s) Advocate : H D SHUKLA Order of The Tribunal
Heard learned counsel for both the parties at length. Since this Tribunal is convinced with the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, the Original Application (OA) is hereby allowed. However, considering the fact that the NOC of the applicant is due to expire today, and since a detailed, reasoned order is to follow, learned counsel for the respondents and Chief Law Assistant, Shri Renison, who is present in the courtroom, are directed to convey to the Competent Authority/Respondents that the applicant has been ordered to be relieved forthwith in terms of the NOC dated 08.10.2025 issued by the receiving Railway, i.e., WCR, Jabalpur. The Registry is directed to supply a copy of this order/hard copy immediately to the learned counsel for the parties and to the officer representing the respondents who is present in the courtroom. A detailed and signed reasoned order in the OA shall follow. Sanjiv Kumar Member (A) Jayesh V Bhairavia Member (J)
Seema Kv ( ps )