Madras High Court
CONT P/546/2026 of M.Selvam Vs M.S.Prasanth, I.A.S., and 5 others on 27 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.10.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
CONT P No. 546 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA010153582026}
M.Selvam
S/o.Late Munuswamy,
Arumbarampattu Village Colony,
Sirpattu Nallur Post,
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi -605 802.
Petitioner
Vs
1.M.S.Prasanth, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Office of District Collectorate,
Kallakurichi District.
2.P.Venkatesan
The Tahsildar
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi District.
3.T.Duraimurugan
The Block Development Officer,
Rishivandiyam Block,
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi District.
4.R.Bhavani
The President,
Arumbarampattu Village Colony,
Sirpattu Nallur Post,
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi District.
5.M.Kannan
S/o.Muiniya Gounder,
Sirpattu Nallur Post,
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi-605 802.
6.M.Shankar
S/o.Muiniya Gounder,
Sirpattu Nallur Post,
Sankarapuram Taluk,
Kallakurichi-605 802.
Respondents
PRAYER
: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 02.06.2023 passed in W.P.No.15336 of 2023.
For Petitioner:
No Appearance
For Respondents:
Mr.S.Ganesh Babu
Government Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) None for the petitioner, when the matter is called out.
2. This contempt petition alleges non-compliance of the order dated 2.6.2023 passed in W.P.No.15336 of 2023.
3. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to issue notice under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Lane Encroachment Act and thereafter to take further process.
4. Today, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate, on instructions, submits that action has already been taken and the encroachment has been removed.
5. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned Government Advocate, nothing survives for adjudication in this contempt petition and, accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
27.10.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,
J.
bbr Cont.P.No.546 of 2026
27.10.2026