Madras High Court
CRP(MD)/2829/2026 of M/s. Shriram General Insuran Vs Balamurugan on 27 October 2026
CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011413582026}
AND
CMP(MD) No. 14551 of 2026
M/s. Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Its Branch Manager, 30, H.A.K. Road, Nearby ICICI Bank, Chinna Chokkikulam, Madurai.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Balamurugan
2. Bajurudeen
3. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Through its Manager Plotjo. 3, Sector - 29, Y
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122 001.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: J-36. Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to allow the Civil Revision Petition by directing the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram to number and decide the application filed by the Petitioner in Unnumbered IA. No. of 2026 in MCOP NO. 111 of 2024 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s Janaki Devi V
CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the return dated 30.07.2026 made in Unnumbered IA. No. of 2026 in MCOP NO. 111 of 2024 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram.
2. The petitioner is the second respondent in M.C.O.P. No. 111 of 2024, filed by the first respondent/claimant seeking compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the petitioner and the second respondent for the injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident.
3. The petitioner filed a petition seeking to implead the insurer of the 1st respondent/claimant’s vehicle as a party to the proceedings. However, without numbering the petition, the trial Court returned the same with the following endorsement: “The petitioner has the right to decide who is a necessary party in the original petition, so how this petition is maintainable. Hence returned.”
4. Instead of re-presenting the petition after complying with the objections raised by the trial Court, the petitioner has filed the present Civil Revision Petition. It is to be noted that the trial Court has not passed
CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026 any considered order on the petition, and the same has only been returned for compliance. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to re-present the petition before the trial Court after complying with the return objections. In the absence of any considered order passed by the trial Court, the present Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable.
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RM Note : Registry is directed to return the original petition to the learned counsel for the petitioner after obtaining photostat copy of the same. Issue order copy on 27.10.2026
CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026 R.POORNIMA, J. RM CRP(MD) No. 2829 of 2026 AND CMP(MD) No. 14551 of 2026 27-10-2026