Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18912/2026 on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 18912/2026
Decided on: 28.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gopal Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Ms. Nandita, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Vinod Chauhan, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-2), seeking applicability of Mukesh Thakur & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and Anr2. has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 3126/2021 decided a/w connected matters on 01.12.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:20:04 :::CIS
2
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment and follow-up action taken pursuant thereto, as reflected in Annexure P-3 (colly.), within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
28th October, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:20:04 :::CIS