Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8483/2022 on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 8483/2022
Decided on: 27.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chander Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: - “ That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the work charge status/regularization to the petitioner w.e.f. the year 2003 instead of the year 2007 with all consequential benefits like arrears, seniority and other service benefits along with interest as per the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the interest of justice and fair play.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner and reliefs claimed for by him have already been adjudicated in State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Surajmani & Anr.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority are
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Civil Appeal No. 1595 of 2025 a/w connected matters decided on 06.02.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:21:53 :::CIS
2 directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
27th October, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:21:53 :::CIS