Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18600/2026 on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 18600 of 2026
Decided on: 27.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suresh Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
HPTDC Ltd and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner:
Mr. Abhishek Thakur ,Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms.Suchita Kaintura, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Suchita Kaintura, learned counsell, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s’ grievance is that his representation, Annexure P-5, seeking applicability of Anil Kumar Goel Vs. The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd and Anr.2 has not been decided till date
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No. 6628 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 24.02.2022 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:22:41 :::CIS
2 by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 27, 2026
Judge Rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:22:41 :::CIS