Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18744/2026 on 27 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 18604/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 27.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 18604/2026
Ved Ram & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
2. CWP No. 18744/2026
Surjeet Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents …………………………………………………………………………….
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: M/s Ravneet Kumar & Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocates, for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents in both the petitions.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:23:24 :::CIS
applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. 2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 27th October, 2026(rohit)
2 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:23:24 :::CIS