Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18847/2026 on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No. 18847/2026

Decided on: 27.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balwinder Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.....Respondents -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1.

Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation on 30.05.2025 (Annexure P-4 colly), seeking regularisation of his services with effect from the due date, in terms of the applicable Government policy, however, the aforesaid representations has not been considered and decided till date, despite the same having been followed by a reminder dated 28.06.2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content if the respondent/competent authority

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:25:00 :::CIS

2 is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, in a time-bound manner.

Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and applicable Government policy, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Judge

27th October, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:25:00 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead