Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18875/2026 on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 18875/2026
Decided on: 27.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anjna Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandresh Pal Vaidya, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of regularization from the date of her initial appointment. Her case is that, in this regard, she has preferred a representation on 25.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) before respondent No. 2, however, the same has not been considered and decided till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that issues raised by the petitioner have been adjudicated in Veena
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:26:14 :::CIS
2 Devi versus State of HP and others2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content if she is permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent/Competent Authority for redressal of the grievance raised in the present petition, with a direction to the said authority to decide the same within a time-bound schedule.
3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks, which shall be decided by the respondents/Competent Authority within six weeks from the date of receipt thereof, in accordance with law and keeping in view the aforesaid judgment. The decision so arrived at shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 27 2026
Judge rohit
2 CWP No. 8377/2026, decided on 13.10.2026 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:26:14 :::CIS