CWP/18882/2026 on 27 October 2026

1. CWP No. 18866 of 2026

Sanjeev Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. CWP No. 18867 of 2026

Bhagwan Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. CWP No. 18868 of 2026

Vivek Prashar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. CWP No. 18869 of 2026

Mahesh Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. CWP No. 18882 of 2026

Suneel Kumar and Ors

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners:

Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Advocates, in

the respective writ petitions.

For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy

Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions.

2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

2 CWP No. 1747 of 2023, decided on 09.10.2023

respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.

3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 27, 2026

Judge R.Atal