Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18885/2026 on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP Nos. 18884 & 18885 of 2026

Decided on: 27.10.2026

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No. 18884 of 2026

Kuldeep Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. CWP No. 18885 of 2026

Ashok Kumar Negi

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Vijay Parmar and others Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.

2 CWP No. 9321 of 2025 decided on 0 6.04.2026

The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 27, 2026

Judge R.Atal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead