Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2119/2026 on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2119 of 2026 Decided on: 27.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Uday Singh
...Petitioner Versus State of HP and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 24.10.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of order dated 24.10.2026 passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary) Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid order dated 24.10.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay scale of Rs.40,100/- after two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:28:59 :::CIS
No.4830 of 2023 titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDO/Principal/Headmaster concerned has been directed to re-fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 18.03.2026, passed in CWP No.3165 of 2026, titled, Uday Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner, within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th October
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:28:59 :::CIS