Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./2514/2026 on 27 October 2026

2026:HHC:46846

2026:HHC:46846

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

Ex. Petition No. 2514 of 2026

Date of decision: 27.10.2026. Bhupender Kumar

...Petitioner.

Versus

State of H.P. & another

...Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Thakur, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General.

Ranjan Sharma, Judge:

Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution and implementation of the order/ judgment dated 03.11.2025 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 17020 of 2025, titled as Bhupinder Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following orders:- “3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

Page 1 of 2

and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s).”

2. Heard.

3. Notice. Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.

4. At this stage, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, Respondents are directed to implement the order/judgment in a time bound manner. [Statement Taken On Record].

5. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned Counsel for the Respondents also.

6. Considering the matter in above perspective, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents- Competent Authority to implement the order/judgment within a period of six weeks from today.

7. In case, any grievance still remains, the petitioner may seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter, in accordance with law.

8. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition stands disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.

(Ranjan Sharma)

Judge October 27, 2026. (kck)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead