Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMMO/856/2026 on 27 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. MMO No. 856 of 2026

Reserved on: 16.10.2026

Date of Decision: 27.10.2026

Aslam Mohammad

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & another

.... Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate. For respondents

:

Mr Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1/State. Mr Aakash Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2023, dated 02.06.2023, registered at Police Station Amb, District Una, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325 and 201 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the consequential proceedings arising out of it based on the compromise effected between the parties.

2. It has been asserted that the parties have reconciled the matter amongst themselves with the intervention of respectable persons of the society. They want to maintain cordial relationship amongst themselves after the compromise. Hence, the present petition.

3. The statement of the informant/victim Sain Bibi was recorded on 31.08.2026, in which she stated that she had entered into a compromise with the petitioner voluntarily and she had no objection to quash the FIR based on a compromise between the parties.

4. Heard.

5. The offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 325 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) are compoundable under Section 320 of CrPC. This Court has quashed the FIR registered for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 201 in Pyar Chand @ Bittu & others vs. State of H.P. & anr 2022:HHC:9585 and Adarash Kumar & Ors. vs State of H.P & Ors.

Cr.MMO No. 1046 of 2023, decided on 16th May, 2024, based on the compromise. These judgments are binding on this Court.

6. Therefore, in view of these precedents, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 86 of 2023, dated 02.06.2023, registered at Police Station Amb, District Una, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325 and 201 of IPC and consequential proceedings arising out of F.I.R. are quashed.

7. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also pending applications, if any.

8. Parties are permitted to produce a copy of this judgment, downloaded from the webpage of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist on the production of a certified copy but, if required, may verify passing of the order from Website of the High Court.

(Rakesh Kainthla)

Judge

27th October, 2026

(Ravinder)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead