Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5727/2026 of Arumugam Vs The Superintendent of Police on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN

THILAKAVADI

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011376772026}

Arumugam

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police

Kanniyakumari District,

Nagercoil.

2. The Inspector Of Police,

Kottar Police Station,

Kanyakumari District.

3. Muthukumar

4. Thangapriya

5. Magesh

6. Pagavatheeswaran

7. Susi Vasan

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd Respondent to conduct a fair, impartial and time-bound investigation, through an independent officer, based on the petitioners complaints dated 17.09.2026, to take strict action against Respondents 3 to 7 in accordance with law, to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family in view of the continuing threat to his life.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s M.Sankar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi

for R1 and R2

Additional Public Prosecutor

Mr.Nagerjun K C

For R3, R4, R6, R7

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to conduct a fair, impartial, and time-bound investigation through an independent officer, based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 17.09.2026, to take strict action against Respondents 3 to 7 in accordance with the law, and to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family in view of the continuing threat to their lives.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, took notice on behalf of Respondents 1 and 2 and submitted that, based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, an enquiry was duly conducted and subsequently closed. A copy of the closure report was also produced before this Court.

3. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for further consideration in this Writ Petition. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026 the closure report, if so advised, in accordance with the law.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands closed. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To

1. The Superintendent of Police Kanniyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2. The Inspector Of Police,

Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 5727 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead