Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30012/2026 of M/s. COGNAX AUTOMATION PVT L Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Of on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011488322026}

AND

M/s. Cognax Automation Pvt. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director, Heerajan, No. 1/27-27, Cresent Plaza, Harbour Express Road, Thermal Nagar Post, Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu-628006

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

Tuticorin II Assessment Circle,

Tuticorin,

Tamilnadu

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED

MANDAMUS, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Order Reference No. ZD330626221217M

dated 23.06.2026 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to remand the matter for reconsideration.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s Selvakumar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Parthiban

Special Government Pleader

WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The order dated 23.06.2026 is assailed in this petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made.

3. Mr.R.Parthiban, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent.

4. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. In these circumstances, subject to the remittance of 10% of the tax demand under the impugned order within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside so as to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the matter on merits. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five (5) months from the date of remittance of 10% of the tax demand. Subject to

WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026 fulfilment of this condition, the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall be raised.

5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No apd To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Tuticorin II Assessment Circle, Tuticorin, Tamilnadu

WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. apd WP(MD) No. 30012 of 2026 AND

26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead