Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30038/2026 of TVL THE SECRETARY, TJSPL3 SO Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011482602026}

AND

Tvl The Secretary, TJSPL3 Soorappallam Primary Agri Co Op Bank Ltd Rep by its Secretary Senguttuvan, Main Road, Soorappallam,

Thanjavur District - 614601.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer /

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

Pattukottai - I Assessment Circle,

First Floor of the Government Building,

Muthupet Road,

Pattukottai,

Thanjavur District - 614601.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned assessment order on the file of respondent vide order Number GSTIN.33AACAT8601R1Z2/2021-22 and in Summary order Reference No.ZD3312252626992 dated 17.12.2025 and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2021-22.

WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s P.Dinesh

For Respondent(s):

M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar

Government Advocate (Taxes)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The order dated 17.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of the principles of natural justice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire tax demand under the impugned order was discharged pursuant thereto. He relies on the documents at pages 57 to 59 of the paper book in this regard.

3. M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), accepts notice for the respondent.

4. Subject to verifying and confirming that the entire tax demand under the impugned order was indeed recovered, the impugned order is set aside so as to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the matter on merits. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five (5) months from the date of confirming the above-mentioned recovery. Subject to fulfilment

WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026 of this condition, the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall be raised.

5. This Writ Petition is disposed of on these terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No apd To The Deputy State Tax Officer / The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Pattukottai - I Assessment Circle, First Floor of the Government Building, Muthupet Road, Pattukottai,

WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. apd WP(MD) No. 30038 of 2026 AND

26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead