Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18519/2026 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.18519 of 2026
Decided on: 26th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Usha Rani Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that the respondents have though conferred the benefit of State of H.P. and others Versus Om Prakash2 in her favour and regularized her services retrospectively under office order dated 18.06.2024 (Annexure P-3), but without releasing any monetary benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 LPA No.54 of 2013, decided alongwith connected matters on 4.10.2019 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:32:59 :::CIS
2
submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation on 09.08.2026 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2 for consequential financial benefits flowing to her from the deemed date of her regularization. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 09.08.2026 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 26, 2026
Judge Mukesh High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:32:59 :::CIS