Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30074/2026 of V.Mahalingam Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011482772026}

AND

V.Mahalingam

TEMP ID 332500003223TMP

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer -II

Kulithalai Assessment Circle,

Commercial Taxes Buildings,

Karur,

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records in TEMP ID 332500003223TMP /2021-22 bearing Reference No.ZD330326221417O dated 25.03.2026 for the assessment year 2021- 22 under section 74 of TNGST Act 2017 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s N.Sudalai Muthu

For Respondent(s):

M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar

Government Advocate (Taxes)

__________

( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )

WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 25.03.2026 imposing GST on seigniorage / royalty is challenged in this writ petition.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. He has made an endorsement to that effect on the bundle.

3. In similar matters, this Court has set aside orders impugned subject to remittance of 10% of the disputed tax demand. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside on condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fresh orders shall be issued within three (3) months from the date of remittance of 10% of the tax demand by the petitioner. Such order shall be subject to the final orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in cases wherein the imposition of GST on seigniorage is under consideration.

4. This Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. There shall __________

( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )

WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026 be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No (2/3) Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No apd To The Deputy State Tax Officer -II Kulithalai Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Karur, __________

( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )

WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. apd WP(MD) No. 30074 of 2026 AND

26-10-2026 (2/3) __________

( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead