Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30183/2026 of E.Kandhasamy Vs The Tahsildar on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011126892026}

E.Kandhasamy

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office,

Kallikudi Taluk,

Madurai District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue patta and upload the same in the official online Revenue Records Portal in respect of New Survey No.118/2H (Old Survey No. 118/2), Villur Bit-II Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District, based on the revenue records standing in the name of the petitioner’s father, Mr.Irulappan, S/o. Vellachamy Thevar.

For Petitioner

:Mr.V.Selvakumar

For Respondent

:Mr.S.Venkatesh

Additional Government Pleader

WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondent to issue patta and upload the same in the official online Revenue Records Portal in respect of New Survey No.118/2H (Old Survey No. 118/2), Villur Bit-II Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District, based on the revenue records standing in the name of the petitioner’s father.

2. Heard Mr.V.Selvakumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.

3. Though the petitioner seeks for a positive direction to direct the respondent to issue patta in his favour, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it would be suffice if a direction is issued to the respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 01.08.2026.

WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026

4. Considering the limited scope of prayer now sought by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions: “The respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.08.2026 on merits and after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kallikudi Taluk Madurai District.

WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 30183 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead