Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30229/2026 of Abdul Sheit Vs The District Revenue Officer on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011487122026}

AND

WMP(MD) No. 23070 of 2026

Abdul Sheit

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Revenue Officer,

Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Vedasandur Taluk Office,

Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to correct the UDR correction in the FMB Sketch in the above said Survey No.117/1A2 and 117/1A3 situated at V.Pudukottai Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District and further direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein do not interfere with the petitioner’s patta lands based on his representation dated 27.04.2026.

For Petitioner

:Mr.G.Gomathisankar

For Respondents

:Ms.M.R.Priyanka Jothi

Government Advocate

WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the first respondent to correct the UDR correction in the FMB Sketch in the above said Survey No.117/1A2 and 117/1A3 situated at V.Pudukottai Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District and further direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s patta lands based on his representation dated 27.04.2026.

2. Heard Mr.G.Gomathisankar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms.M.R.Priyanka Jothi, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought in the Writ Petition, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions: “The first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.04.2026 on merits and after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all interested parties, if any,

WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026 shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District Dindigul

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk Office, Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 30229 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead