Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30232/2026 of Erudhayamuthu Vs The Revenue Divisional Offic on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

W.P(MD)No.30232 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011508582026}

Erudhayamuthu

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Revenue Divisional Office,

Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office,

Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3. Palraj

4. Muthurayar

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to cancel the Patta No.89, issued in favour of the Respondents 3 and 4 in respect of Survey No.l09/5B2, measuring an extent of 0.36.00 hectares, situated at Thirumalaipuram Village, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner’s appeal dated 16.09.2026 under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, 1983.

For Petitioner

:Mr.R.Murugappan

For R1 and R2

:Mr.P.Sathish Kumar

Government Advocate

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the first respondent to cancel the Patta No.89, issued in favour of the Respondents 3 and 4 in respect of Survey No.l09/5B2, measuring an extent of 0.36.00 hectares, situated at Thirumalaipuram Village, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner’s appeal dated 16.09.2026 under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, 1983.

2. Heard Mr.R.Murugappan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Sathish Kumar, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with.

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s appeal is pending with the first respondent in relation to the cancellation of patta granted in favour of the respondents 3 and 4, without entering into the case of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions:

“The first respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, dated 16.09.2026 on merits and in accordance with law after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all interested parties including the respondents 3 and 4 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 30232 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead