Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30263/2026 of Dharmalingam Vs The District Revenue Officer on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

W.P(MD)No.30263 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011488232026}

Dharmalingam

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Revenue Officer,

District Collectorate,

Pudukkottai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Revenue Divisional Office,

Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Illuppur Taluk Office,

Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.

4. Chellam

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.08.2026

and rectify the error under UDR Scheme and consequently issue patta in favour his father’s name Azhagu after conducting proper enquiry in respect of Survey Nos. 188/IC and IE is situated at Nangupatti Revenue Village, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

For Petitioner

:Mr.K.Arunraj

For R1 to R3

:Mr.P.Sathish Kumar

Government Advocate

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.08.2026 and rectify the error under UDR scheme and consequently issue patta in favour the petitioner’s father’s name Azhagu after conducting proper enquiry in respect of Survey Nos. 188/IC and IE is situated at Nangupatti Revenue Village, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2. Heard Mr.K.Arunraj, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Sathish Kumar, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.

3. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought in the Writ Petition, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions:

“The first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.08.2026 on merits and after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all interested parties including the fourth respondent shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To

1. The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate,

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Tahsildar Illuppur Taluk Office,

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 30263 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead