Madras High Court
WP(MD)/30277/2026 of J.Vasanthamahalakshmi Vs The District Collector on 26 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.DILIP KUMAR
WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011507902026}
J.Vasanthamahalakshmi
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Tenkasi District,
Tenkasi.Tenkasi.
2. The Block Development Officer,
Jew Kadayam Panchayat Union,
Kadayam, Tenkasi District - 627 415.
3. S. Thangaraj
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the Tender and the Work Order allotted to the 3rd respondent in pursuant to the Tender Notification issued by the 2nd respondent vide Tender ID: 2026_RDTN_702990_l, Ref No:
COLRD/1446/2026/A2 dated 04.10.2026 and thereby direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue a fresh Tender Notification as per Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2026 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.R.Selvam
for Mr. G.Thalaimuthurasu
__________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )
WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026
For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.Sivasubramanian
Government Advocate (Civil side)
For R1 & R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Sivasubramanian, learned Government Advocate (Civil Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that pursuant to the tender notification mentioned in the prayer, work order had already been issued and he had also handed over a copy of the same to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on receipt of the same, would pray that he may be permitted to not press this writ petition with liberty to challenge the work order issued in favour of the successful bidder and any other connected proceedings.
3. Giving such liberty to challenge the work order or any of the connected proceedings, in the manner known to law, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )
WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026 gbg To
1. The District Collector, Tenkasi District Tenkasi.Tenkasi
2. The Block Development Officer Jew Kadayam Panchayat Union Kadayam, Tenkasi District - 627 415. __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )
WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026 N.DILIP KUMAR, J. gbg WP(MD) No. 30277 of 2026 26-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 12:20:50 pm )