Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18619/2026 on 26 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 18348 of 2026 along with
connected matters.
Decided on : 26
th October
, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 18348 of 2026. Pooja Rajput ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 18417 of 2026. Smt. Nisha Sharma ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 18418 of 2026. Mamta Kumari ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
4. CWP No. 18659 of 2026. Ashwani Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
5. CWP No. 18453 of 2026. Anjana Kumari ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
6. CWP No. 18442 of 2026.
Kulbhushan Thakur & Ors. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
7. CWP No. 18454 of 2026. Shivani Sharma ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.
8. CWP No. 18619 of 2026. Shailja Sood ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.
9. CWP No. 18459 of 2026. Prem Lata & Ors. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
10. CWP No. 18460 of 2026. Kuldeep Singh
...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, Mr. Bhender Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate, Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Anil 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Anita Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters.
4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms thereof. 2CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024
5. With the above observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 26th October, 2026.
(jai)