Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18937/2026 on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.18937 of 2026

Decided on: 26th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dharam Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Kumar and Mr. Munish

Datwalia, Advocates.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Mr. Rahul Gathania, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioner’s grievance relates to non-release of arrears due to him on account of his retrospective regularization. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation (Annexure P-6) in that regard to the respondents. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:36:35 :::CIS

2

the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer.

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 26, 2026

Judge Mukesh High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:36:35 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead