Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18954/2026 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.18954 of 2026
Decided on: 26th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pratibha Thakur
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandresh Pal Vaidya, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Veena Devi Versus State of H.P. and Ors.2. It is seen from the record that though the petitioner has preferred a representation (Annexure P-4) to the respondents for the redressal of her grievances, however, the aforesaid representation does not
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.8377/2026, decided on 13.10.2026 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:37:02 :::CIS
2 seek redressal of all the reliefs, which the petitioner has primarily claimed in this writ petition.
3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 26, 2026
Judge Mukesh High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:37:02 :::CIS