Himachal Pradesh High Court

COPC/1202/2026 on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

COPC No.1202 of 2026

Decided on: 26.10.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar and Ors

....Petitioners

Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Anr

…Respondents _________________________________________________________________

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate.

For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Learned Deputy Advocate General has handed over separate cheques in the sum of Rs.15,00/-, drawn in the name of the petitioners, in terms of costs imposed in the previous order, to their learned counsel.

2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has also placed on record office instructions dated 24.10.2026 from Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, conveying that the budget has been received from the Government and has further been allocated to the concerned DDOs/Principals for

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:37:56 :::CIS

further disbursement to the petitioners on 07.10.2026.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have till date not received the amount.

Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the amount due and admissible to the petitioners shall now be released to them as expeditiously as possible, but in any case not later than two weeks from today.

4. In view of above, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Judge October 26, 2026 R.Atal High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:37:56 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead