Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/1196/2019 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:46352
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 1196 of 2019
Date of decision: 26.10.2026. Bhagwan Dass & another
...Petitioners.
Versus
State of H.P. & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate vice Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioners had filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 10340 of 2012 and upon establishment of the State Administrative Tribunal, the matter was transferred to the Tribunal; and after its abolition, the same has been re-transferred to this Court as CWPOA 1196 of 2019, seeking the following reliefs: “(i) That the respondent department may kindly be directed to grant pension to the petitioners from due date alongwith interest in view of the provisions contained in Clause 49 of the CCS (Pension) Rules as the petitioners have
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:38:56 :::CIS
completed the minimum qualifying service for the purpose of pension in the interest of justice and fair play.
(ii) That the respondents may also be directed to grant the benefits of gratuity to the petitioners for the period, they remained on daily wage service in view of the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court in case titled as Lashkari Ram vs. State of H.P. with all consequential benefits.
2. Upon issuance of notice on 10.12.2012, parties have exchanged the pleadings inter se.
3. Upon listing of the case today, Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate, on Instructions of Ms. Archna Dutt, Original Counsel, prays for giving a quietus to the instant proceedings due to subsequent events. [Statement Taken On Record].
4. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel.
5. Considering the matter in above perspective, instant proceedings and all pending applications shall stand accordingly closed.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 26th October, 2026. (kck) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:38:56 :::CIS