Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/97/2026 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. PT. No.97 of 2026 Decided on: 26.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Savitri Devi
...Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 23.10.2026, issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of order dated 17.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Secondary) Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid order dated 17.10.2026 reveals that the services of the petitioner have been regularized as Class-IV (Peon-cum-Chowkidar) w.e.f. 17.07.2017 with all consequential benefits i.e. the date from
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
her juniors have been regularized by considering her initial joining as Part Time Water Carrier w.e.f. 08.05.2002 in the pay scale of Rs.4900-10680+1300 (GP)+usual allowances. The monetary benefits will be admissible to the concerned from the date of filing the petition i.e. 23.10.2013.
3. This Court while allowing the writ petition preferred by the petitioner had directed the respondents to assign seniority to the petitioner w.e.f. 08.05.2002 with all consequential benefits. However, it was clarified that the monetary benefits shall be paid to the petitioner from the date of filing of the petition.
4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 09.03.2026, passed in CWPOA No.2279 of 2019, titled, Savitri Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with and the services of the petitioner have been regularized from the date when her juniors have been regularized w.e.f. 17.07.2017, with all consequential benefits, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the financial benefits are not released in favour of the petitioner from the date of filing the petition i.e. 23.10.2013, within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the execution petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th October
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge