Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2209/2026 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 2209 of 2026
Decided on : 26
th October
, 2026
Sarita Devi ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Gitika Dhiman, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Following order was passed in this matter on 24.09.2026. “Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Petitioner claims that, though pursuant to the judgment, respondents have passed speaking order, but admissible arrears have not been released till date. Only first and second installments have been released to the petitioner and the third installment became due to the petitioner in the month of November 2025. It has still not been paid. In case any installment of arrears admissible to the petitioner remains to be paid by the respondents, the same be cleared within four weeks, failing which the respondents may have to entail the liability to pay the due amount with interest. List on 26.10.2026.”
2. Pursuant to above, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 24.10.2026 from Director, School Education. As per these instructions, the total arrears payable to the petitioner have been calculated at Rs. 2,16,000/-. The amount is payable to the petitioner in five equal installments of Rs. 43,200/- each. Petitioner has 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:39:17 :::CIS
2 already been paid Rs. 1,51,200/-. In other words, more than the amount due to the petitioner even under the third installment stands released to him along with the first and second installments. The third installment therefore stands adjusted in the first and second installments. In fact, an excess amount of Rs. 21,600/- has been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner will accordingly be released the fourth installment in terms of office instructions issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh.
3. In view of above office instructions, the present execution petition stands disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of surviving grievances, in case necessity arises in future.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 26th October, 2026.
(jai)
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:39:17 :::CIS