Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/301/2026 on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 301 of 2026 Date of Decision : 26.10.2026 Krishan Lal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For Respondent No.1-State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The offences punishable under Sections 329(3) and 303(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) are compoundable under Section 359 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). This Court has held in Gagandeep
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:39:29 :::CIS
Kaur Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2026:HHC:26010 that if the offences are compoundable the High Court should not exercise the powers vested in it under Section 528 of BNSS to quash the FIR. Hence, in these circumstances, the present petition is dismissed. Parties are relegated to avail appropriate remedy available under law. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 26th October, 2026 (Chander) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:39:29 :::CIS