Madras High Court

CRL OP/30508/2026 of P.Senthilkumar Vs The State rep by the Inspector of Police on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012524092026}

P.Senthilkumar

S/o Panaiyadiyan,

4/195, East Street,

Pommanapadi Post,

Perambalur Taluk and District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.The State rep by the Inspector of Police Perambalur Rural Police Station, Perambalur District.

Crime No. 243/2025

2. Veerasingam

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records relating to the Cr.No.243 of 2025 dated 13.09.2025 on the file of the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and abuse of process of law and pass such further or other orders.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Bharath Kumar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar,

Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.243 of 2015 registered by the first respondent police for offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS, as against the petitioner.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a land dispute between the petitioner and the de facto complainant, the petitioner attacked the de facto complainant, causing him to sustain injuries for which he was immediately hospitalized. Based on these allegations, the de facto complainant lodged a complaint. Consequently, the matter was referred to the District Crime Branch (DCB) for an enquiry regarding the land dispute. While this enquiry was pending, the petitioner repeatedly abused, attacked, and threatened the de facto complainant and his grandson. Hence, the case.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that it is a case and counter. Hence he prayed to quash the same.

CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent police submits that the investigation in Cr.No.243 of 2025 has already been completed, and the said FIR has been closed as a “Mistake of Fact.” Consequently, the a referred charge sheet has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Perambalur.

5. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Vv Note: Issue Order Copy today itself. To

1. The Inspector of Police, Perambalur Rural Police Station, Perambalur District.

2. The Public Procedure, High Court of Madras.

CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Vv CRL OP No. 30508 of 2026 16-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead