Madras High Court

CRL OP/30519/2026 of Muruganantham Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by, The Superintendent of on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012541292026}

Muruganantham

..Petitioner

Vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by,

The Superintendent of Police

Cuddalore,

Cuddalore District.

2. The Inspector of Police

Cyber Crime Police Station,

Cuddalore,

Cuddalore District.

3. Abarna

..Respondents

PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members, his friends and their family members based on the false complaint of the 3rd respondent and her husband under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioner:

Mr. NA.Palaniyandi

For Respondents:

Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar,

Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 and R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 06:10:38 pm )

CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent police harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that the police called the petitioner for enquiry in the pending FIR in Crime No.85 of 2026. The case where the FIR is pending against the petitioner, there is no scope for this Court to entertain the petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, under the caption "Not to harass".

4. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

5. Under such circumstances, once the regular FIR has been registered, the question of “Not to harass” will not arise. Any direction issued by this Court at this stage will amount to interfering with the investigation conducted by the respondent police. Hence, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No LPP/PSK

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 06:10:38 pm )

CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026

To

1. The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2. The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Police Station, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 06:10:38 pm )

CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. LPP/PSK CRL OP No. 30519 of 2026 16-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 06:10:38 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead