Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18819/2026 on 16 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18819 of 2026
Date of Decision: 16.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Abhishek Thakur
……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Before the case at hand could be heard and decided on its own merits, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that petitioner would be content and satisfied in case he is permitted to make an application/representation before the trial Court in terms of the judgment dated 22.04.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 2690 of 2024, titled Priya Thakur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:47:28 :::CIS
2
2. Learned counsel representing the respondents are not averse to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an application/representation before the trial Court in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in Priya Thakur's case within a period of two weeks, which shall be decided by the Court concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks, in terms of the mandate contained in Priya Thakur's case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
October 16, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (sunil)
Judge
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:47:28 :::CIS