Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23722/2026 of Prabhakaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011393662026}

and Crl.MP(MD)No.22330 of 2026

1. Prabhakaran

2. Sunthareswaran @ Appu

3. Rajasekar

4. Chandrasekar

5. Vasanthakumar

6. Jothi Murugan

7. Bharathi @ N.Siddaiya Bharathi

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.The State of Tamilnadu, rep by,

The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Virudhunagar District.

2.The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By,

The Inspector Of Police,

Sivakasi East Police Station,

Virudhunagar District.

Crime No.508/2026.

3. Vasanthakumar

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: To call for the records of the impugned FIR in Crime No.508

of 2026 dated 23.08.2026, on the file of the 2nd respondent Police and to quash the same as illegal and for consequential orders.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s.S.Manoj Vasanth

For Respondent(s):

M/s. B. Arun

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 & R2

M/s.V.A.Bavanash for R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Crime No.508 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 191(2), 126, 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 r/w Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.

3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the F.I.R.

4. Considering the above said facts, F.I.R. in Crime No.508 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSS To

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District.

2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector Of Police, Sivakasi East Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. DSS CRL OP(MD) No. 23722 of 2026 and Crl.MP(MD)No.22330 of 2026 16-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead