Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23927/2026 of Pasupathi Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. on 16 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011471342026}
1. Pasupathi
2. Vinoth
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police Viruveedu Police Station, Dindigul District,
2. Raja
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble. High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to FIR. In Crime No.145 of 2026 dated 13.07.2026 by the 1st respondent police and QUASH the same as against the petitioners and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s N.Mariappan
For Respondent(s):
M/S. B. Arun
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1
M/s.S.Balaji for R2
__________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 05:51:40 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Crime No.145 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023
2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.
3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the F.I.R.
4. Considering the above said facts, F.I.R. in Crime No.145 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSS __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 05:51:40 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026 To
1. The Inspector of Police Viruveedu Police Station, Dindigul District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 05:51:40 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. DSS CRL OP(MD) No. 23927 of 2026 16-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 27/10/2026 05:51:40 pm )