Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/2904/2020 on 16 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:46269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.2904 of 2020
Decided on: 16.10.2026 __________________________________________________________ Mani Ram
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner had filed an Original Application No.4934 of 2017 before Learned State Administrative Tribunal and upon its abolition, the same stands re- transferred to this Court as CWPOA No.2904 of 2020, seeking the following relief:- “7(i) That the respondents may be directed to give appointment letter to the applicant as Post Graduate Teacher (IP) in pursuance to the nomination made by the respondent No.3 Special Ex- servicemen Employment Cell vide communication dated 22nd October, 2016 without any further delay and benefit may be given to the applicant from the date of said nomination and arrears may be paid alongwith interest at the rate of 12% per annum.”
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:50:39 :::CIS
2026:HHC:46269
2. Upon issuance of notice on 19.09.2017, the parties have exchanged the pleadings inter-se.
3. Upon issuance listing of matter today, Learned Counsel on Instructions of petitioner-Mani Ram received through whatsapp on 27.03.2026 [Taken on Record], states that the petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings, hereinafter and the proceedings may be given a closure [Statement Taken on Record].
4. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by the Learned State Counsel also.
5. Considering the above facts, nothing survives for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner and therefore, instant proceedings are closed.
6. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 16, 2026
[Bhardwaj] High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:50:39 :::CIS