Madras High Court
CRP/1548/2026 of Kannan Vs Radhika on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Civil Revision Petition No.1548 of 2026
and
C.M.P.No.7316 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA013080242025}
Kannan
S/o.Ramasamy
..Petitioner
Vs
Radhika
W/o.Kannan
..Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 15.04.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Virudhachalam.
For Petitioner :
Mr.Joshua Immanuel Samuel
For Respondent :
Ms.P.A.Lavanya
*****
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 15.04.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2021 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Virudhachalam, wherein the application filed by the petitioner seeking for DNA
profiling of the petitioner, respondent and the child born to the respondent, came to be dismissed by the Court below.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and carefully perused the material available on record. This Court also went through the impugned order.
3. The respondent has filed HMOP.No. 61 of 2021 seeking for the relief of restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner, who is the husband filed a counter claim and sought for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty, desertion and adultery.
4. According to the petitioner, the respondent had deserted the petitioner during March, 2017 and thereafter, during November, 2018, the respondent delivered a child and according to the petitioner, there was absolutely no contact whatsoever between the petitioner and the respondent from March, 2017. Therefore, the petitioner wanted DNA profiling to be done for the petitioner, respondent and the child. The said application was dismissed by the Court below.
5. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is willing for the DNA
profiling.
6. In the light of the above submission, without going into the merits of the case, the Court below shall proceed further with the process of DNA profiling. This civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mp To The Principal Sub Court, Virudhachalam.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. mp Civil Revision Petition No.1548 of 2026 16-10-2026