Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR.R/274/2026 on 16 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 274 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.10.2026. Lal Dingtu ...Petitioner Versus Surender Kumar ...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Dalip Singh Kaith, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) It has been stated on behalf of the respondent/complainant that the matter has been reconciled between the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the receipt dated 16.10.2026, issued by Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹11,250/- being the 7.5% of the cheque amount of ₹1,50,000/-, which is taken on record.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent/complainant, under instructions, submits that the matter has been reconciled between the parties and he has instructions not to press the complaint.
4. In view of this statement, the present revision is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.07.2025, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla, H.P. in Case (Registration) No. 95 of 2018, titled Surender Kumar Vs. Lal Dingtu as affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla, H.P. in CIS Case (Registration) No. 79 of 2025 dated 30.03.2026, titled Lal Dingtu Vs. Surender Kumar are ordered to be set aside.
5. It has been submitted that ₹50,000/- have been deposited before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla, H.P. which has to be disbursed to the respondent/complainant in terms of the compromise. Let the amount of ₹50,000/-, deposited before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur Bushehar, District Shimla, H.P. are ordered to be disbursed to the respondent/complainant by remitting the same to his bank account alongwith upto date interest on furnishing of the bank account details if not furnished earlier. It has been stated that no other amount has been deposited; hence no other order is required to be passed regarding release of the amount.
6. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody and he is presently lodged in Model Central Jail, Kanda, District Shimla. He is ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Release warrants be prepared accordingly and the same be sent to the Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Kanda, District Shimla through FASTER forthwith for necessary compliance.
7. In view of the above, the present revision is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 16th October, 2026 (Nikita)