Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/11180/2026 on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.11180of 2026
Date of Decision: 15.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Ramesh Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.4. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 12.10.2026, issued under the signature of Superintending Archaeologist, learned DSGI states that sum of Rs. 30.00 lakh have been approved by the competent authority for restoration work of Sarai at Trilokinath Temple Mandi District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. Aforesaid communication further reveals that work was published on 24.9.2026 and same shall be opened on 15.10.2026. If sufficient bidders participate in tender, it will be allotted to any of the successful bidder, High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:56:55 :::CIS
2 who fulfill the conditions laid down by the office of Superintending Archaeologist.
2. Since it is quite apparent from the perusal of aforesaid communication that steps have already been taken for renovation and restoration of the Sarai, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with direction to the Superintending Archaeologist to ensure that entire work of restoration and renovation of Sarai is completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of issuance of award letter in favour of successful bidder. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
3. List for compliance in the first week of January 2027.
October 15, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:56:55 :::CIS